Evaluation of the CSE-UCLA Model on the Performance of School Counselor in Indonesia

Fatchurahman, M. and Setiawan, M. Andi and Karyanti, Karyanti (2022) Evaluation of the CSE-UCLA Model on the Performance of School Counselor in Indonesia. lnternational Scientific Electronic Journal, Perspectives of Science & Education, 56 (2). pp. 561-572. ISSN 2307-2334

	Text 1. Dokumen ISEJ v56s2 2022.pdf Download (3MB)
	Text 2. Peer Review ISEJ v56s2 2022.pdf Download (1MB)
	Text 3. Plagiarism Checker ISEJ v56s2 2022.pdf Download (136kB)

Abstract

The problem and the aim of the study. Evaluation is an attempt to review whether the program follows the objectives and achieves the expected goals. The evaluation of the UCLA CSE model was chosen because this model is very suitable for evaluating ongoing Education programs. This study aims to find out how the performance of counselors in schools using the UCLA SCE evaluation model. Research methods. This research is evaluation research with five stages: the assessment system, program planning, implementation program, Program Improvement, and Certification Program. The research subjects were 180 people divided into 150 students and 30 counselors from state high school 1 Palangkaraya, state high school 1 Kuala Kapuas, state high school 1 Sampit, state high school 1 Katingan, State Senior High School 1 Pangkalan Lada. The research instruments used in this study were interviews, questionnaires, observation, and documentation. This research instrument was used to obtain data related to the performance of counselors in Indonesian schools. Data analysis was carried out in-depth by analyzing the percentage of the questionnaire results that the research subject had filled in. Results. The results showed that the guidance and counseling services had been running in a good category. The analysis results show that the evaluation of the UCLA CSE model carried out shows that every aspect gets a score with good criteria. The assessment aspect gets a score (72.40), the planning program (69.20), program implementation (70.00), improvement program (70.16), and program certification 73.20 if. The average evaluation result is (70.99) good category. The research findings show that the results of the very good category have not been found, so school counselors need to improve the quality of service to achieve the very good category. Excellent service will help school counselors gain the trust of students and parents. Conclusion. Evaluation of the program using the UCLA CSE model conducted in several schools in Indonesia shows that the school’s guidance and counseling service program has been running in a good category. Support from the system needs to be strengthened to recognize guidance and counseling in schools. School counselors need to socialize guidance and counseling services so that students become more confident and confident in the existence of guidance and counseling. The government also needs to provide a strategic position of guidance and counseling in the world of education so that the existence of school counselors is increasingly recognized and has an important role in the world of education.

Actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads